Some voters believe that registering as an “independent” is a cutting-edge, even cool thing to do. That made me think about party labels, what they mean, and about those who reject party labels yet may want to vote in the primary of a party they made a conscious decision not to join.
I grew up in New York City and like D.C. most voters were Democrats. Many had experiences with discrimination and the Democratic Party was a comfortable political home. New York was a melting pot and home to many minority groups. There were Jews who escaped the Holocaust; Irish Americans whose ancestors escaped the famine; and Cubans who fled Castro. My parents weren’t political but mom was an activist fighting for everything from planting more trees, integrating schools and stopping Columbia University from taking over more of the Morningside Heights neighborhood.
At 12, I joined a local Democratic club. Being a Democrat meant joining the party of JFK, Lyndon Johnson and Robert Kennedy. I was proud to be a member of the party that supported civil rights, women’s rights and, as I got older and came out, the party whose platform evolved to support the rights of the LGBT community. Disliking a candidate of my party didn’t lead me to become a Republican or an independent but rather inspired me to join with others in the party to push for change. We fought to elect progressive Bill Ryan (D-N.Y.) to Congress. We supported Hubert Humphrey in 1968 and George McGovern in 1972. Though we lost the presidency, we continued to fight for the principles we believed in within the party. We had an intra-party fight that resulted in Bella S. Abzug (D-N.Y.) being the Democratic candidate for Congress after Bill Ryan died.
Through the years, the party I choose has been more in tune with my beliefs than any other. So it’s perplexing that mayoral candidate David Catania, who is smart and an independent, found that the Republican Party matched his principles for all the years it did. He moved to D.C. in 1986 for college and for the next 16 years until 2002, when he was already an elected official, proudly called himself a Republican even supporting and contributing to George W. Bush’s presidential campaign. He left his party and registered as an ‘independent’ only when it became clear the GOP didn’t support gay rights and actually worked to make things worse for the LGBT community. I figured that was for personal expediency to keep his seat on the Council not realizing until recently that it was more than that when he was quoted in the Washington Post saying, “The Republican Party that I grew up with disappeared a long time ago. As far as being an Independent, it’s a suit that really fits. I joke that I’ve been in one bad marriage and I’m not about to jump into another.” He needs to explain what principles the Democratic Party stands for that were so abhorrent to him as to consider it would be a bad marriage.
The ‘I’ label on the ballot means the person doesn’t identify with a particular party and voters don’t necessarily have an indication what they believe. What set of political principles do they espouse? What is it about my Democratic Party they find objectionable? Is it support for unions? LGBT civil and human rights? Public education, women’s rights, choice, equal pay for women, raising the minimum wage, removing impediments to voting or working to deal with climate change? If they agree with all those positions are they simply afraid to run in a primary or are they ‘independent’ simply for political expediency?
Recently it’s been suggested that D.C. voters may be coerced or bullied into voting Democratic. That is absurd and offensive. People vote for candidates whose positions they like and who they feel comfortable with. When they do consider party in their decision, it’s often because it gives them a window into the candidates’ beliefs on issues that may not be part of the discussion in a particular election but are still very important to them.
Some ascribe the ethics problems in D.C. to a particular party. But ethics problems relate to individual candidates. Some might consider that George W. Bush being elected in 2000 caused more harm to District residents, especially those with family members in the military or National Guard, than lying on a mortgage application for which one D.C. Council member was appropriately indicted and convicted.
Positions, history and vision are important when considering who to vote for but don’t be coerced or bullied into not considering party affiliation when voting. It is one factor of so many in choosing a candidate. We have a Democratic president and likely will still have a Democratic Senate in 2015. During the term of the next mayor we will very possibly elect the first woman president, Democrat Hillary Rodham Clinton. So one additional factor voters might want to consider in choosing a mayor is who will have more access to power to benefit the people of the District. Would it be a former Republican who walked away from his party to become an independent, or a woman who is a proud fifth generation, D.C. Democrat? Just more food for thought.
This column first appeared in the Washington Blade.
Interesting how the woman the apparatchiks of the Republican Party are suggesting is old and brain damaged still constitutes their worst nightmare. Republicans are throwing everything they have up against the wall to see if it sticks trying to keep Hillary Rodham Clinton from running for president.
Their problem is this woman who they are trying to paint as diminished in some way is clearly miles ahead in energy and brainpower from any of the people that want the 2016 Republican nomination. Reince Priebus, his cohorts on the Republican National Committee, and guys like Karl Rove are quaking in their boots at the possibility the Democrats will have Hillary at the top of the ticket and someone like Julian Castro (Mayor of San Antonio and nominated to beSecretary of Housing and Urban Development) as the vice presidential candidate. Democrats could actually win Texas in the 2016.
Of course those high approval numbers Hillary has now will come down during the rough and tumble of a campaign. But she only needs 270 electoral votes to win and Hillary will win every state that Obama won and may very well add West Virginia, Arkansas and even Texas among others, if Castro is on the ticket. The real Republican nightmare is that she will have skirt-tails and bring in a Democratic House and Senate with her.
Hillary would be the most qualified person to ever run for president. Her accomplishments have led her to consistently be the most admired woman in America. In the annual Gallup poll, "Hillary Clinton has been named Most Admired Woman a total of 18 times, more than any other woman in Gallup's history, including each of the last 12 years."
Americans no longer question her accomplishments because the record on that is clear. She has been a force in turning around how America is viewed by the world putting a welcoming face on America's foreign policy. She traveled the globe as secretary of state, meeting not only with kings, presidents and prime ministers, but with university students, women and children and was able to relate equally well to all of them. She modernized the State Department and earned the respect and support of all the brave men and women who serve in our foreign service. They know she fought for them and transformed their jobs by challenging them to adapt to emerging issues such as cyber security. She created the Center for Strategic Counterterrorism Communications and the Bureau of Energy Resources in the State Department.
Hillary Clinton understands the role of economic statecraft and worked hard to make America an economic partner to the world. In her own words, "Economic statecraft has two parts: First, how we harness the forces and use the tools of global economics to strengthen our diplomacy and presence abroad; and second, how we put that diplomacy to work to strengthen our economy at home." Her success in that area is clear. Using economic diplomacy she helped grow exports of American goods to China by 50 percent in two years and did it because she understood that 800,000 U.S. jobs depend on the export of goods and services to China. She was able to facilitate closing the $21.7 billion deal for Boeing aircraft, the largest in Boeing's history, which was announced at the ASEAN Business and Investment Summit in 2011. Hillary understands that in most of the 294 embassies and consulates that the United States has around the world the discussions aren't about war but about the work needed to strengthen our ties to those nations to benefit their people and our own. Our representatives in those countries under Secretary of State Clinton worked to improve trade and bring needed jobs to people in the countries where they served and back home. That included an estimated $100 million contract for electric vehicles built by workers in Ohio and sold to Iceland.
Hillary Rodham Clinton has a vision for America that includes all of us. It is a vision that has been forged by hard work and an understanding of people both here and abroad. Hillary's instincts as a woman are to nurture but she combines that with a lethal intellect and a willingness to use force if necessary to secure the safety of the American people. Hillary understands that military power, economic power and political power are all part of America's arsenal but more than anyone else she understands that the use of this combined arsenal must have as its goal improving the human condition around the world. Hillary's efforts in Iraq to help end the war also resulted in 2 million girls going to school who weren't in school before. Hillary understands that this arsenal of power in the hands of the president must be used to strengthen families because when families are stronger we are all better off and safer.
Her innate abilities and her history of working for the American people is what so scares the Republican Party. From her early work for the Children's Defense Fund to being first lady of Arkansas and then first lady of the United States Hillary has shown she cares and is effective. Add to that her election and reelection as United States senator representing the people of New York to being secretary of state representing America to the people of world and Republicans understand that Hillary Rodham Clinton is such a formidable candidate that they will continue to use everything they can, including lies and innuendo, to keep her out of the race.
But many are asking her to run because they believe if she runs she will win. When Hillary Rodham Clinton is sworn in on January 20, 2017, as the most qualified, and first woman President, people around the world including more than half its population still striving for equality will gain a whole new respect for the United States of America and its people.
Arianna Huffington has a number one New York Times bestseller with her new book Thrive. It is in many ways a very personal book and she writes that its catalyst was a fall she took brought about by exhaustion and lack of sleep. Now anyone following Huffington’s brilliant career and knowing how many things she is involved in couldn’t be in the least surprised that she suffers from a lack of sleep. No one would be able to do all the things she does and sleep too. My invitation to the book party came through a good friend Herbie Ziskend who now works with Huffington. As I said to Arianna when I got to meet her she is lucky to have him. Herbie is an incredibly smart young man who came to Washington with the Obama administration in 2008 and is now bringing all his knowledge and experience with him to the Huffington Post.
In the book Huffington talks about her mother and the advice she gave her to see the moment. To not always be looking to the future and striving for more so that you miss the moment you are living in. Good advice for anyone.
At the book party, which was held at the Jefferson Hotel, Huffington was introduced by Senator Al Franken who sounded more like the comedian than the Senator he is today and that was a good thing. He kidded Huffington that she was the only one who would find the antidote to exhaustion was to sign a new book contract. He also suggested that the speech she gave to the graduating class at Smith College may have been difficult for the graduates’ parents to hear. After all they had struggled to pay for their daughters’ education only to hear Huffington suggest there is more to life than business success.
Huffington in her comments reminded people that she had never heard a eulogy for anyone that sounded like their Linkedin profile. Paraphrasing her comments “Whoever in a eulogy reminded people that the person who had just died successfully increased revenue for their company for six straight quarters.” Everyone got the point.
In her speech to the Smith graduates Huffington “likened our drive for money and power to two legs of a three-legged stool. They may hold us up temporarily, but sooner or later we are going to topple over. We need a third leg.” Huffington calls that third leg the “Third Metric for defining success in order to live a healthy, balanced and meaningful life.” In the book she describes that third metric as “our well-being, our ability to draw on our intuition and inner wisdom, our sense of wonder, and our capacity for compassion and giving.”
Arianna Huffington is an amazing woman who has accomplished much in her life. Along with a very public personal life with all its headlines, she has raised two daughters and authored 14 books. She co-founded and is President of Huffington Post which today is one of the most influential media outlets around the world. It has given people like me an outlet to write about how we see the world and share our thoughts and ideas. I think everyone can get some good ideas on how to improve their lives from the pages of Thrive.