Hollywood on the Potomac
By guest contributor Dimitrios Machairidis
What’s more representative of spring, other than flowers, swallows and music? “The Greek countryside, the passerines that take shelter during spring and summer that fill the place with peppy and lively sounds, played a major role in my design. In a sense [the] Starbucks logo influenced my inspiration. I tried to create something that was close to the logo’s cartoon-like look without exaggerating the shapes and colors.” Haritos Mountoufaris, the Greek barista and winner of the Starbucks paper cup design contest, told Hollywood on the Potomac.
In September 2015, Starbucks launched the Partner Cup Design Contest for its employees in Europe, the Middle East and Africa. More than 350 employees submitted their artwork for the three Starbucks cup sizes: tall, grande and venti. Haritos Mountoufaris from Greece was the winner for the tall Starbuck cup (12 fl oz) design, Olya Ravcheeva from Russia for the grande cup (16 fl oz), and Sandra Margveliani from the United Kingdom for the venti cup (20 fl oz). By coincidence, all of the three winners joined Starbucks in 2014. Olya works as shift supervisor in Moscow. Sandra and Haritos work as baristas in London and Athens respectively.
We’re not sure what our friends across the pond think of our politicians or the Presidential campaign process, but we love the Brits….particularly the rowdy bunch in Parliament … and figured they could pass along some tips. We have The Art of the Deal, they have The Art of the Insult which we may want to adopt here in the US. MPs are forbidden from using language that might ‘offend the dignity’ of Parliament. “This commonly covers swearing, personal insults and, most seriously, accusing an MP of being dishonest,” according to historians. “Many words have been deemed unparliamentary by House Speakers over time including ‘coward’ – ‘guttersnipe’ – ‘hooligan’ – ‘liar’ – ‘traitor’ and ‘git’.” Here’s the kicker: “Many MPs have perfected the art of insult whilst avoiding reprimand from the House Speaker and enjoy mocking their rivals with stock phrases such as being ‘economical with the truth’ when lying or ‘unusually fatigued’ when drunk.” Just sayin’.
Hollywood on the Potomac sat down with British conservative Steve Hilton, author of More Human: Designing a World Where People Come First at a book launch in his honor at the Kalorama home of Juleanna Glover, co-hosted with Niki Cristoff, Josh Ginsberg, Tammy Haddad, Susan Molinari and Steve Schmidt.
We asked Hilton, who worked in the government with Prime Minister David Cameron on Downing Street, to describe the difference between the conservative party in Great Britain and in the US. “There are many differences,” he told us, “because of the different heritage and the different histories of the two countries, but I think that the thing that unites the conservative movement – if I could call it that generally and it’s very much a theme of my book – is this belief that if you trust people and give them responsibility then you tend to get better outcomes than if you try and determine things according to some centralized bureaucratic master plan. So I think that is something that the two versions of conservatism definitely have in common. I just think it tends to be the case that those on the left of politics tend to have greater faith in the ability of a centralized authority to deliver the good society whereas those on the right tend to be more skeptical of that and prefer, instead, to disperse power and put power in people’s hands directly. That’s not to say that they always deliver on that when they’re actually in government.”
“I love Larry Wilmore. I’ve been a guest on his show. He could not be nicer,” CNN’s Ashleigh Banfield told Hollywood on the Potomac at the CNN’S Political Hangover brunch at Long View Gallery about WHCAD comedian Wilmore over which there was much controversy. “He’s smart, talented. The only thing I didn’t like was his hitting on my bestie Wolf Blitzer. But it’s all in fun and everybody is a big boy and a big girl. We’re all good. I think he’s the greatest and I wish him the best.”
“A struggle….just a struggle, just that easy. A struggle for him and a struggle for the audience. It’s was a struggle,” money guru Suze Orman added to the already piling up comments against Wilmore.
Up or down on Wilmore? “I think it was a dud. Big down. The President was extremely funny; the President did the job that Larry Wilmore should have done last night,” said a guest who wished to remain anonymous. “The President found a really good balance, Wilmore is a little sick. They should have ended with the President. Wilmore was horrible.” This, of course, is pretty much a standard fare reaction to the WHCAD comedians. Think Stephen Colbert or Don Imus.